$600,000 Nottingham Drive Conservation Acquisition Finalized to Protect 3.14 Acres Near Taylor Bray

Key Points

  • Commission authorizes $600,000 for Nottingham Drive land purchase to expand Taylor Bray Farm
  • Split 5-1 vote allows stone revetment at Great Island following failed bioengineering attempts
  • Enforcement order ratified for unpermitted patio at 21 Glenwood Street despite homeowner's environmental efforts
  • Board members clash over consistency of landscaping plan requirements and variance approvals
  • Anglewood Beach Condo Association ordered to use wood-only materials for beach fence replacement

The Yarmouth Conservation Commission moved to finalize a major land preservation deal on Thursday, authorizing the purchase of 3.14 acres of land off Nottingham Drive. The acquisition, valued at $600,000, is part of a broader effort to expand the footprint of Taylor Bray Farm and secure environmental storm protections for the area. Motion Made by P. Huggins to accept the deed for approximately 3.14 acres off Nottingham Drive for $600,000 and authorize Chair David Bernstein to execute documents. Motion Passed (6-0-0). The board followed this action by approving a conservation restriction to the Trustees of the Yarmouth Conservation Trust, ensuring the parcel remains undeveloped. Motion Made by P. Huggins to approve the conservation restriction. Motion Passed (6-0-0).

Environmental stabilization at Great Island sparked a more contentious debate as the commission weighed the merits of "hard" shoreline armoring versus bioengineering solutions for properties at 911 and 921 Great Island Road. Engineer Bob Perry, representing Dewey and Margaret Awad, argued that previous "soft" solutions like fiber rolls had failed, leading to erosion rates of three to five feet per year. Perry noted that fiber rolls have no mass and are temporary, proposing a stone revetment instead. Member Bradford Bower questioned the shift, asking Why didn't the bioengineering options meet your satisfaction? and pushing for a more detailed landscaping plan. While Member John Frost praised the homeowner's participation in the process, saying The whole system is to be commended, Bower remained skeptical of the impact on the coastal bank. Motion Made by D. Bernstein to accept the proposal for a stone revetment with special conditions, including a planting list approved by the Conservation Agent. Motion Passed (5-1-0), with B. Bower opposed.

The commission also addressed unpermitted work at 21 Glenwood Street, where resident Mark Doran appeared to answer for the installation of a patio and stonewall within the wetland buffer zone. Doran, who noted he has lived on the street for 65 years, told the board I'm embarrassed to be here. We didn't know we did anything wrong. He explained that the family had intended to be sensitive to the environment by using permeable pavers. While Vice Chair Paul Huggins noted The work this family has done is magnificent, he joined the board in requiring an after-the-fact filing to bring the property into compliance. Motion Made by B. Bower to ratify the enforcement order. Motion Passed (6-0-0).

A separate enforcement response involved the Anglewood Beach Condo Association at 1 Shore Road, where a dilapidated chain link fence is slated for replacement. Applicant Jessica de Mars faced sharp questioning regarding the quality of her application materials. I find this submittal sort of unacceptable, Bower said, noting a lack of specific site references. Huggins agreed, stating This is pretty sketchy. Typically, don't we require a plot plan? Conservation Agent Britney clarified that the association was attempting to meet a tight deadline under an enforcement order, noting Joe and I review for completion, not necessarily quality. Chair David Bernstein insisted on strict materials standards, telling the applicant When you say it's a split rail fence, is it wooden? We would not allow vinyl. De Mars responded that she simply wanted to get someone out there to make it a safe area. Motion Made by J. Frost to issue a Negative Determination with conditions that the fence be wood-only with no concrete footings and hand-dug installation. Motion Passed (6-0-0).

The commission also saw success for a seawall and pier project at 49 Neptune Lane. Mark Burgess of Shorefront Consulting presented revised plans that increased the vegetative buffer to 10 feet. The vegetative buffer strip was increased to 10 feet, Burgess confirmed, addressing previous board concerns. Motion Made by J. Frost to accept the revised proposal for seawall reconstruction and pier float expansion. Motion Passed (6-0-0). In further Great Island activity, the board approved the "in-kind" reconstruction of beach access stairs at Point Gammon. Perry noted that the stairs, near the historic 1880s lighthouse, would be rebuilt using hand-carried materials to minimize dune disturbance. Motion Made by J. Frost to accept the proposal for stair reconstruction. Motion Passed (6-0-0).

The meeting concluded with a broader discussion on the board's consistency regarding new landscaping regulations. Bower expressed concern that the commission was becoming too lenient with variances, stating I think we've granted three variances in a couple of months. We aren't being consistent. Frost argued for flexibility, suggesting the board be more sensitive to the situation of each individual applicant. Agent Britney suggested the group review all special conditions together in the future to ensure a unified understanding of the 250-square-foot threshold for professional plans.